Charlottesville rally trial: jury discovers far-right plot


While many far-right actors have been sidelined, ideology has not. Over the past decades, whenever far-right groups have lost in court, the movement has rebounded.

“While some of the messengers have been gutted, the most common versions of their hate propaganda continue to have real currency, with wide exposure ensuring that violence from the far-right fringes will unfortunately continue,” said Brian Levin. , director of the Center. for the study of hate and extremism at California State University, San Bernardino.

In seeking to prove that the violence was predictable, the plaintiffs pointed out how many times the idea of ​​hitting protesters with cars had been raised beforehand.

Samantha Froelich, who was simultaneously dating two of the main organizers before the rally but has since left the movement, testified that hitting protesters with cars was discussed at a party earlier that summer at the “Fash Loft” “. Short for fascist, the nickname for Mr. Spencer’s apartment in Alexandria, Virginia.

After the violence, Mr. Parrott, whose The Traditionalist Workers’ Party has since been dissolved and the rest have celebrated. “Charlottesville was a tremendous victory,” he said in a post. “The alt-right is not a pathetic faceless Internet fad, but a formidable street fighting force.”

While the plaintiffs’ case took three weeks and 36 witnesses, the defendants rested after a day and a half, having presented four main arguments. First, they argued that while others might deplore their views, the First Amendment allowed them to do so. Second, that they acted in self-defense. Third, that the police were to blame for not separating the opposing parties. Fourth, none of them could anticipate what Mr. Fields had done because no one knew him.


Comments are closed.